As Russia remains occupied with its war in Ukraine, Iran focuses on defending its territory against U.S. and Israeli attacks, and China maintains its involvement in both conflicts under the bar that would trigger direct conflict with America, Washington is leveraging its position in Iraq. These efforts by the U.S. and its allies have taken on further urgency as Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi announced last week that the country plans to raise oil production to between 8 million barrels per day (bpd) and 10 million bpd within six years — so the U.S. and its allies want to be best positioned to benefit from that. So, what has Washington been up to in recent weeks and why?

Following the U.S.’s unilateral withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA, or colloquially ‘the nuclear deal’) in 2018, China and Russia moved quickly to exploit perceived American weakness across the Middle East. In Iraq’s case, Russia had effectively seized control over the country’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region in the north through three initiatives analysed in full in my latest book on the new global oil market order. China had done a similar job in the south of the country through two wide-ranging cooperation deals in 2019 and 2020 — the ‘Oil for Reconstruction and Investment’, which allowed Chinese firms to invest in infrastructure projects in Iraq in exchange for oil, and the equally all-encompassing ‘Iraq-China Framework Agreement’, as also fully detailed in that book. The upshot of these strategies was that at the beginning of Donald Trump’s second presidency in 2025, Russia held sway over much of northern Iraq’s oil sector, while Chinese companies managed around 34% of Iraq’s proven reserves and two-thirds of its full-capacity production. China was also busy linking together the individual pieces in southern Iraq’s oil jigsaw that it had quietly established through dozens of low-key ‘contract-only’ deals by relatively unknown Beijing-directed firms into a full exploration-production-refinery-export hub infrastructure that threatened to leave the U.S. excluded from key future exploration and production decisions.

Trump’s team at the beginning of the second term moved to neutralise several of these levers of influence over Iraq by Russia and China, beginning with sanctions that saw Russian companies effectively forced out of the Kurdistan Region, as fully analysed by OilPrice.com. The U.S. also fired sanctions warning shots at Beijing over Iran and Iraq, while at the same time Western firms secured key oil field and infrastructure deals across the north and south of Iraq. In the same context, two American oil and gas giants in recent weeks have moved to consolidate this advantage, in the shape of ConocoPhillips and Chevron. The former has agreed to acquire a 42% interest in BP Energy Company of Kirkuk Limited from British oil and gas supermajor BP, supporting the redevelopment of five producing oil fields in the Kirkuk area of northern Iraq — the Baba dome (of the Kirkuk field), the Avanah dome (of the Kirkuk field), the Bai Hassan field, the Jambur field, and the Khabbaz field. This followed the activation by BP on 2 October last year of the US$25 billion five-pronged oil and gas megadeal, which is targeting a preliminary production target of 328,000 barrels per day (bpd), according to a senior source who works closely with Iraq’s Oil Ministry, exclusively spoken to by OilPrice.com at the time. This is expected to rise to at least 450,000 bpd within the next two to three years, and then to be reassessed with a view to an increase in output and plateau production figures. The lifting cost of many of these barrels will be at or close to Iraq’s average of US$2-4 pb, and the project is set to run 25 years, although the contract will then be open for renewal. Although the five fields are already estimated to hold up to 9 billion barrels of oil reserves, these are very conservative estimates, according to the Iraq source. “There’s at least another eleven or twelve billion barrels across the near surrounding area, and possibly much more,” he underlined recently. There are much broader geopolitical implications in this deal too. Beijing and Moscow have long worked for Kurdistan to be subsumed into a single unified Iraq, governed out of Baghdad, with the West pushed out of the country entirely. As a very high-ranking official from the Kremlin exclusively revealed to OilPrice.com some years ago: “By keeping the West out of energy deals in Iraq, [Russia and China will see] the end of Western hegemony in the Middle East will become the decisive chapter in the West’s final demise.”

Chevron, meanwhile, is moving forward with two of southern Iraq’s largest oil fields. Following the implementation of major sanctions by the U.S. and Great Britain, Russia’s Lukoil withdrew from the supergiant West Qurna 2 field, leaving the way open for the U.S. firm. The field, located 65 kilometres northwest of the southern port of Basra and with roughly 14 billion barrels of reserves in place, had been steadily producing around 400,000 bpd — about nine per cent of Iraq’s total oil production at that time — under the operation of Lukoil, which held a 75% stake in the field (the remainder held by Iraq’s state-run North Oil Company). The development plan was to increase crude oil production to 480,000 bpd in Phase 2, and then to add another 650,000 bpd to the total in Phase 3, which would focus on the deeper Yamama formation. The ultimate target of 1.13 million bpd might appear high to some (although the original target was 1.2 million bpd), but it is entirely justified both by US geologists when they were on the ground during the US occupation and by various international oil companies. Additionally beneficial to Chevron’s prospects here, and to Iraq’s target of achieving over 6 million bpd of oil production by 2029, are the synergies that will be available to the U.S. firm from other Western majors now in operation again across the country. Not the least of these is the Common Seawater Supply Project (CSSP), which involves taking seawater from the Persian Gulf and transporting it to oil production facilities to boost pressure at key oil reservoirs, as detailed in full in my latest book on the new global oil market order. The second oil field to be developed by Chevron is Nasiriyah, for which it also signed an addendum to a heads of agreement letter a few days ago. Situated in southern Iraq’s ThiQar province, the idea of developing the 4.36 billion-barrel Nasiriyah oilfield has been seriously mooted by each of the rapid succession of governments in Iraq since it was discovered by the Iraq National Oil Company in 1975. These plans have variously been for the standalone development of the oil field or its development within the broader scope of the ‘Nasiriyah Integrated Project’ (NIP) that also includes the corollary construction of a 300,000-bpd refinery. All major plans stalled in one way or another, but last week’s signing of the agreement with Chevron signals that a sustained and substantial development of Iraq’s hidden hydrocarbon gem may finally be underway, again aided by the parallel development of the CSSP.

freestar.config.enabled_slots.push({ placementName: “oilprice_medrec_incontent”, slotId: “oilprice_medrec_incontent” });

This post appeared first on https://oilprice.com